3 Analysts and Therapists
In turn of the century Vienna a quite different
kind of analysis was being born. Sigmund Freud having trained
as a medical doctor under Charcot -an hysteria specialist -
developed the science of psychoanalysis. The departure in Freud's
work was that for the first time an arena of psychic reality was
isolated as a proper subject for investigation in its own right,
taking the treatment of first hysteria and later other psychic
illnesses out of the realm of physiognomy altogether. Freud
replaced Charcot's questionable hypnotic method with one of
association through analysis.
Freud's methods were immediately wreathed in controversy as
the ambiguity of a 'psychic realm' opened itself up to all kinds
of eccentricities. First Freud had to break links with Wilhelm
Fliess, whose cocaine cure and crank association with the nose
and the psyche was throwing the whole project in doubt. Later
Freud had to distance himself from Karl Jung, whose theories of
'race memory' took psychoanalysis to the giddier heights of
German romanticism. The tendency to schism persisted with
breaches between Freud and Melanie Klein and Karen Horney .
Perhaps the biggest challenge to the
psychoanalytic orthodoxy that Freud worked at through the
International Psychoanalytic Association, though, comes with the
overwhelming success of the 'talking cure', and the explosion of
therapy and therapists. Whilst the structures Freud established
carefully annexed psychoanalysis to medical science, making a
psychoanalytic training an arduous process, but equally one that
kept the quality control of the professions as a model, the
growth of new therapeutic methods on the model of Freud's talking
cure were not subject to the same rigour.
In particular Carl Rogers' humanistic
psychology involved therapy but overturned some of the key
safeguards that Freud's professionalism had built into the
analyst-analysand relationship. Rogers called his approach
'client-centred' ostensibly reversing the dominant relation of
the analyst. This approach had been proposed many years before by
one of Freud's early associates, Sandor Ferenczi. It was of
course a disaster in the making as the authority of the analyst
was the precondition for establishing analysis as a cure, as a
movement from a state of psychic illness to 'ordinary
unhappiness' in Freud's words. Without an explicit relation of
authority, the objectivity of the cure was lost. In truth
Rogerian analysts were the dominant partners in the treatment,
only they chose to obscure that fact.
The implication of the growth of therapy was
quite the opposite of Freud's original concept. For Freud, psychic illnesses were
the exception - consequences of an imperfect formation of the
personality. But with therapy becoming widespread the distinction
between ill-health and ordinary unhappiness was being lost. The
implication of the 'client-centred' approach, and other attempts
to challenge the authority of the analyst was to lose the
distinction between delusion and rational beliefs.
Hysteria
In France feminist followers of the radical
analyst Lacan short-circuited Freud's clarification of a
realm of psychic reality distinct from physical reality by
insisting that the hysterics perception was, in its own terms
rational. Who is mad? challenged Helene Cixous and Luce
Irigaray, the hysterical woman who
finds her life under male oppression intolerable, or the
psychiatrists who aim to reconcile her with that life. Raising
the slogan 'we are all hysterics', the feminists created a mirror
image of the traditional view of women. Also they lost the
distinction on which Freud's psychoanalysis was based, the
distinction between physical and psychic reality.
Infant seduction
In 1980 Jeffrey Masson was made
director of projects of the Freud archives. Having retrained as a
psychoanalyst he impressed Anna Freud so much that he
shot to the height of the Freudian world. But Masson nursed an
oedipal desire to overthrow the master. His exposure of the
Freud-Breuer letters, with their scandalous exposure of Freud's
quackery with cocaine, led to an irretrievable breakdown between
Anna Freud and the archives and Masson. But Masson was not
finished. He felt that he had evidence of a bigger scandal. Early
in his career Freud was surprised by the number of patients who reported
that they had been seduced as infants. Freud reported this
finding to shocked colleagues. According to Masson's version,
Freud suppressed his own discovery of widespread child-abuse
under pressure from his peers. Masson's exposure The Assault
on Truth rocked the psychoanalytic world.
In fact Freud's reversal of his
original findings on infant seduction were in keeping with his
distinction between psychic reality and physical. He judged that
the patients were reporting real psychic events, but that these
did not correspond precisely to real physical events. Rather the
episodes reflected the infantile fantasies of seduction. Such an
interpretation, though, was unlikely to survive the growing
belief that 'children don't tell lies'. Freud of course would
agree, only that he would distinguish between the truths children
told about themselves and real world events. None the less,
Freud's psychic reality has fallen victim to a growing confusion
between illusion and reality, a distinction that many now argue
is false.
4 Structuralists
and functionalists